Measuring the political policy development of the gig economy in Indonesia

Authors

  • Andika Drajat Murdani Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
  • Hasna Wijayati Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.200

Keywords:

Digitalization, Gig Economy, Gig workers, Indonesia, Political Policy

Abstract

Digital transformation has presented gig economy with its complexity.  In Indonesia, where technology is widely used, gig economy is viewed as a growth driver. Even so, there have been various dynamics from economic and political interests in the development of the gig economy. This research aims to analyze the political policies development of the gig economy in Indonesia, as Indonesian government response to developments in Indonesia's gig economy. The analysis was using qualitative research methods, with a library research approach. Data collected then interpreted and understood through descriptive and narrative analysis. The research found that the Indonesian government considers the gig economy is an opportunity for many workers. However, the government's response through its political policies seems inconsistent and only gave partial response based on the problems. The government wants to encourage the gig economy as an opportunity to advance the country's economy, such as through tax collection, and tried to provide a response and protection needs for gig workers. However, there are still regulatory limitations that cannot guarantee and protect the interests of the security and future of gig workers. In a political economy analysis, this condition shows the low level of sustainability in guarding the development of a gigantic economy.

References

Anwar, M. C. (2019). Bos BKPM: Potensi Pajak Grab & Gojek Rp 5 T Pertahun. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20191017190042-4-107940/bos-bkpm-potensi-pajak-grab-gojek-rp-5-t-pertahun

Aristi, N. M., & Pratama, A. R. (2021). Exploring Familiarity and Participation in Online Gig Economy Among Indonesians. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1077(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1077/1/012066

ASSOCHAM. (2020). GIG ECONOMY Aligning Consumer Preferences: The Way Forward. In The Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India. https://www.assocham.org/uploads/files/1628143386.pdf

Berg, J. (2019). Protecting Workers in the Digital Age: Technology, Outsourcing and the Growing Precariousness of Work. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3413740

Berger, L., Guo, L., & King, T. (2020). Selfish Sharing? The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Tax Reporting Honesty. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04409-z

Bessa, I., Joyce, S., Neumann, D., Stuart, M., Trappmann, V., & Umney, C. (2022). A global analysis of worker protest in digital labour platforms. In ILO Working Paper: Vol. null. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91e46445c2110431a4061f0bc079d2065658c0d8

BPJS. (2020). Sejarah Perjalanan Jaminan Sosial di Indonesia. BPJS. https://www.bpjs-kesehatan.go.id/bpjs/index.php/pages/detail/2013/4

DDTC News. (2022). Artikel ini telah tayang di DDTCNews dengan judul “Kantor Pajak Ingatkan Pengemudi Ojol Hitung dan Setor PPh-nya Sendiri”. Baca selengkapnya: https://news.ddtc.co.id/kantor-pajak-ingatkan-pengemudi-ojol-hitung-dan-setor-pph-nya-sendiri-40721. Penulis: Red. DDTC News. https://news.ddtc.co.id/kantor-pajak-ingatkan-pengemudi-ojol-hitung-dan-setor-pph-nya-sendiri-40721

Department of Statistic Malaysia. (2020). Gig workers in Malaysia: A review of definitions and estimation. Department of Statistic Malaysia, 2017–2018. https://dosm.gov.my/v1/uploads/files/6_Newsletter/Newsletter 2020/DOSM_MBLS_1-2020_Series-8.pdf

Fairwork. (2021). Fairwork Indonesia Ratings 2021: Labour Standards in the Gig Economy. https://fair.work/wp-content/uploads/sites/131/2021/06/Fairwork-UK-Report-2021.pdf

Halilintarsyah, O. (2021). Ojek Online , Pekerja atau Mitra ? 02(September), 64–74.

Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kualitatif. In Repository.Uinsu.Ac.Id (Issue April). CV Pustaka Ilmu Group.

Hariani, A. (2022). DJP: Penerimaan PPN PMSE Capai Rp 9,17 T. Pajak.Com. https://www.pajak.com/pajak/djp-penerimaan-ppn-pmse-capai-rp-917-t/

Jabagi, N., Croteau, A.-M., Audebrand, L. K., & Marsan, J. (2019). Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255

Jayani, D. H. (2021). Tingkat Pekerja Paruh Waktu Makin Meningkat Sejak 2016. Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/11/12/tingkat-pekerja-paruh-waktu-makin-meningkat-sejak-2016

Keban, Y. T., Hernawan, A., & Novianto, A. (2021). Menyoal Kerja Layak dan Adil Dalam Ekonomi GIG di Indonesia. In IGPA Press. https://igpa.map.ugm.ac.id/2021/12/07/unduh-buku-menyoal-kerja-layak-dan-adil-dalam-ekonomi-gig-di-indonesia/%0A%0A

Kuhn, K. M., & Galloway, T. L. (2019). Expanding perspectives on gig work and gig workers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(4), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2019-507

Large, O., & Tay, P. C. (2022). Making It Work: Understanding the Gig Economy’s Shortcomings and Opportunities (Https://Www.Institute.Global/Insights/Tech-and-Digitalisation/Making-It-Work-Understanding-Gig-Economys-Shortcomings-and-Opportunities).

Mawanda, M. K., & Muhshi, A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Mitra Ojek Daring di Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 6(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.9203

Mehta, B. S., & Kumar, A. (2020). Future of Work: the Emerging Gig Economy. Journal of Development Policy Review, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4112906

Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of Research Methodology: A Compendium for Scholars & Researchers. In Dimensions Of Critical Care Nursing. EDUCREATION PUBLISHING. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003465-199001000-00018

Murdiyanto, E. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Teori dan Aplikasi disertai Contoh Proposal). In Yogyakarta: LPPM UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Press. LPPM UPN Veteran Yogyakarta Press. http://www.academia.edu/download/35360663/METODE_PENELITIAN_KUALITAIF.docx

Murillo, D., Buckland, H., & Val, E. (2017). When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.024

Nik Nazli, N. N. N., & Sheikh Khairudin, S. M. H. (2018). The Factors That Influence Transfer of Training and Its Effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Evidence from Malaysia Civil Defense Force. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2017-0080

Niti Aayog. (2022). India’s Booming Gig and Platform Economy: Niti Aayog Report, 154. https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-06/25th_June_Final_Report_27062022.pdf

Oei, S.-Y., & Ring, D. M. (2019). The Tax Lives of Uber Drivers: Evidence from Internet Discussion Forums. Columbia Journal of Tax Law, 8(2), 56–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7916/cjtl.v8i2.2842

Oxfam. (2014). How Politics and Economics Intersect. https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/how-politics-and-economics-intersect-a-simple-guide-to-conducting-political-eco-312056/

Permana, M. Y., Izzati, N. R., & Askar, M. W. (2023). Measuring the Gig Economy in Indonesia: Typology, Characteristics, and Distribution. SSRN Electronic Journal, 21(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4349942

Rofiqi, M. H. (2020). Politik Kebijakan Pemerintah Presiden Joko Widodo Terhadap Transportasi Berbasis Online Tahun 2014-2019. Parapolitika: Journal of Politics and Democracy Studies, 1(1), 18–54. https://parapolitika.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/pp/article/view/2

Sevilla, S. (2020). The voices of the unheard : The reality behind the working life of Indonesian gig workers in the transport industry. June, 33.

Sonhaji, S. (2018). Aspek Hukum Layanan Ojek Online Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 1(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i4.371-385

Sudrajat, A. (2020). Pajak E-Commerce, Pemecahan dan Solusinya. Jurnal Pajak Vokasi (JUPASI), 2(1), 22–36.

Tahar, A., & Septiani, D. D. (2021). Pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan terhadap Pengusaha dalam Transaksi Perdagangan Online (E-commerce) Studi Pengusaha Online di Yogyakarta. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(6), 1390. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2021.v31.i06.p03

Todorov, G. (2023). Impressive Gig Economy Stats 2023 [Facts and Trends]. https://thrivemyway.com/gig-economy-stats/

Uchiyama, Y., Furuoka, F., & Akhir, M. N. M. (2022). Gig Workers, Social Protection and Labour Market Inequality: Lessons from Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 56(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2022-5603-09

Upwork. (2022). Freelance Forward 2022. https://www.upwork.com/research/freelance-forward-2022

Wardhana, V. H. K., Herlina, M. G., Bangsawan, S., & Tuori, M. A. T. (2020). Regulatory Developments in the Gig Economy: A Literature Review. The Winners, 21(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v21i2.6758

Yoel, S. M., & Hasym, M. W. (2021). Healthcare Protection for Gig Workers: A Brief Case During Pandemic. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2020 (ICLHR 2020), 549(Iclhr 2020), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210506.053

Zaman, U., Nawaz, S., Javed, A., & Rasul, T. (2020). Having a whale of a time: Linking self-determination theory (SDT), job characteristics model (JCM) and motivation to the joy of gig work. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1807707. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1807707

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Murdani, A. D. ., & Wijayati, H. . (2023). Measuring the political policy development of the gig economy in Indonesia. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.200

Issue

Section

Development Economics, Communication