Implementation of the principles of legal certainty and legal justice in free decisions defendant of narcotics crime (Study decision number 281/Pid. Sus/2021/Pn Rni)

Ajlin Ajlin; Kuswardani Kuswardani; Muchamad  Ikhsan

doi:10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.211

Authors

Ajlin Ajlin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Kuswardani Kuswardani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Muchamad Ikhsan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.211

Keywords:

Decisions, Principles of Legal Certainty, Principles of Legal Justice

Abstract

The research aims to find out the legal basis and judge's considerations in the decision (Number 281/Pid. Sus/2021/PN RNI and to find out whether the decision (Number 281/Pid. Sus/2021/PN RNI) has fulfilled the principles of legal certainty and legal justice The research approach uses normative law, which is legal research by looking at library materials consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Then these legal materials will be processed and arranged systematically, studied, then conclusions will be drawn. related to the problem under study. Results: First, the legal facts show that the defendant was caught red-handed while taking a package containing leaves, stems and dried seeds, which is marijuana which is included in Class I narcotics at the JNE agent and the arrest was considered legal according to statutory regulations. in force, as stated in the decision of the Raba Bima District Court Number 281/Pid. Sus/2021/PN RNI, the defendant was not proven to have violated the provisions of Article 114 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics Crimes and the defendant was acquitted, after carrying out basic legal analysis and careful consideration, the defendant's mistake was proven to fulfill the elements of possession of the goods. However, in this case the judge did not carefully interpret the element of control so that the decision was considered wrong both theoretically and practically.

References

Akbar, C. T. (2020). Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Putusan Bebas (Vrijspraak) Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Anggota Kepolisian (Putusan No. 184/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Bta) (Issue July, pp. 1–23).

Amelia Ervanda, V., & Soponyono, E. (2020). Keabsahan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Melalui Media Teleconference Dalam Hukum Acara Di Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum:Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 29(2), 131–147.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.

Ariyanti, V. (2019). Kebebasan Hakim Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Menangani Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 4(40), 163–167.

CASANOVA, Y. (2021). Implementasi Upaya Penanggulangan Penyebaran Obat-Obatan Terlarang (Studi Kota Bima). Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14(1), 1–13.

Debby Aulia Hakim, D., Zairani Lisi, I., & Gusta Andini, O. (2021). Penerapan Asas The Binding Persuasive of Precedent Di Bawah Ketentuan Minimum Khusus Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Risalah Hukum, 17(2), 85–97.

Dewi, S. D. R., & Monita, Y. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8314

Dio Lavarino & Wiyli Yustanti. (2016). Peninjauan Kembali Terpidana Berdasarkan Kekhilafan Dan Kekeliuran Hakim Judex Facti Dalam Mengadili Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 15 PK/PID.SUS/2016). Jurnal Verstek, 152(3), 28.

Fikarlia, J. (2023). Disparitas putusan terhadap tindak pidana narkotika ditinjau dari kepastian hukum. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 7(1), 122–135.

Firsta, E., Ar, N., & Rakhmawati, D. (2023). PAMPAS : Journal Of Criminal Law Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama dikarenakan dampaknya yang luar biasa , tidak hanya merusak keuangan publik dan dan illegal untuk mendapat. 4, 184–190.

Fremmy, B., Lubis, E., & Mulyono, M. (2022). Optimalisasi Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan Bukti Di Persidangan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 240/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Tng). Veritas, 8(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i2.2067

Frengky Manurung. (2020). “Dekriminalisasi” Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pengguna Narkotika Dengan Mengalihkannya Kepada Proses Hukum Administratif Atau Pelayanan Kesehatan. Law_Jurnal, II(159), 62–79. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/disparitas,

Hasaziduhu Moho. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 13(1), 138–149.

Isnantiana, N. I. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina, 18(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920

Kusumawarni, B. A. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram No: 308/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mtr). Unizar Recht Journal, 1(4), 430–440.

Mas, M., & Renggong, R. (2021). Analysis of Cassation Lawsuits by the Prosecutors towards the Prosecution. Ndonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 3(2), 88–93.

Nasrullah, N. (2020). Putusan Hakim terhadap Pemberian Sanksi di Bawah Batas Minimal pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v2i1.59

Nugroho, B. (2017). Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap. Yuridika, 32(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780

Pardede, R. Y., Syahrin, A., Ekaputra, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Dibawah Ancaman Pidana Minimum Khusus Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 775K/Pid.Sus/2020). Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 143–155. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih

Rachmawati, T. (2017). Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. UNPAR Press, 1.

Rozi, F. (2019). Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Yuridis Unaja, 1(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.35141/jyu.v1i2.486

Setyawan, E. H., Budyatmojo, W., & Setiyanto, B. (2019). Implementasi Pemidanaan Di Bawah Minimum Khusus Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Journal Recidive, 8(3), 227–237.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Wahyudi, S. T. (2012). Problematika Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.207-234

Wibowo, A., & Widiyasmoko, I. A. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana di Bawah Minimum Khusus: Studi Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.345-369